Luke 14:7-14 reads:7 When he noticed how the guests
chose the places of honor, he told them a parable. 8 ‘When
you are invited by someone to a wedding banquet, do not sit down at the place
of honor, in case someone more distinguished than you has been invited by your
host; 9 and the host who invited both of you may
come and say to you, “Give this person your place”, and then in disgrace you
would start to take the lowest place. 10 But when
you are invited, go and sit down at the lowest place, so that when your host
comes, he may say to you, “Friend, move up higher”; then you will be honored in
the presence of all who sit at the table with you. 11 For
all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will
be exalted.’
12 He said also to the one who had
invited him, ‘When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends
or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, in case they may invite
you in return, and you would be repaid. 13 But when
you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the
blind. 14 And you will be blessed, because they
cannot repay you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.’
I could spend a lot of time commenting on the concept of “Table”
as it appears in scripture. The Bible
uses the term over 150 times. The
beginning and ending of such a survey is what we now call The Lord’s
Table. By any estimation the table is a
significant place.
So, Jesus has some practical advice regarding table behavior
here. We are free to take it at face value. “This is how you act when someone invites you
to their table.” “This is how you
conduct yourselves when you invite others to your own meal.”
At another level, Jesus extends rabbinical instruction for
the living of our lives. There are a
couple of wrinkles in all this that I am trying to work out. For instance, in the opening verse Luke
states that Jesus “told them a parable.”
But literarily, there is no parable.
There is no “Who among you…” or “There was a certain man…” the lack of proper identification does not
negate the importance of these instructions.
But there is no way to construe these sayings as constituting parables. I have found no reference work or listing of
the parables of Jesus that includes this passage.
In Luke 8:4-15 the gospel writer records the so-called Parable
of the Sower. When his disciples ask for
the meaning, Jesus interprets it as an allegory: the seed has a particular
meaning, as do the various kinds of soil and the weeds and the birds. A parable makes a single point. An allegory has multiple symbols within its
narrative. This is to say that upon
occasion scripture may give a label such as “parable” (which sometimes merely
indicates “story”) when the form is that of another kind of literature.
So, to seek out the single thrust of a piece of illustrative
material can sidetrack us in instances such as the text before us.
Another point with which I contend here is Jesus’ counsel in
the first section. He seems to be
upholding humility: But when you are invited, go and sit down at the lowest
place… That seems to be consistent
instruction for those whom Jesus teaches elsewhere to be servants of one
another or to carry no provisions for the road when his disciples embark on a
missionary journey.
But, look at what happens when Jesus finishes the thought: “…,
so that when your host comes, he may say to you, Friend, move up higher”
then you will be honored in the presence of all who sit at the table with you. There is not much humility or servitude in
that. The motive for the instruction to go
to the foot of the table is so that the host might extend an invitation to ascend
to a position of greater honor. There
are some who interpret this to say that disciples should spend their lives
humbling themselves and moving to the figurative foot of the table so that
their exaltation might be their inclusion in heaven. There may be some helpful advice there, but
to offer it in this manner is a bit of a stretch. If the point of all this is genuine humility,
I would expect the person who sought the place of least honor to refuse the encouragement
of the host. “No, no, I am fine
here. Let your more important guests sit
in the places of honor.”
I am not criticizing Luke – or Jesus! I am confessing that I am grappling with this
text, seeking to come to a satisfactory conclusion regarding the instruction.
I’ll have more to say later.
The Peace of the Lord be with you.
Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Monday, August 18, 2025
But, the Bible says...
Luke 13:10-17
10 On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues, 11 and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. 12 When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, “Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.” 13 Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God. 14 Indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, the synagogue leader said to the people, “There are six days for work. So come and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath.” 15 The Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Doesn’t each of you on the Sabbath untie your ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it water? 16 Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?” 17 When he said this, all his opponents were humiliated, but the people were delighted with all the wonderful things he was doing.
I could spend a lot of time reflecting on the modern world’s
approach to the quasi-Sabbath. Christians
worship on Sunday, the “first day of the week,” the day in which Jesus rose
from the tomb. The historic church transferred
a lot of Sabbath sentiment from the Old Testament to its current practice. But, in the strictest sense, anyone who
treats Saturday (the seventh day) as a regular day or a recreational day and
then spends all day Sunday in church is still a Sabbath-breaker. There is no way around it. So, as I look at this passage from Luke as it
informs our faith practice, the calendar considerations are inconsequential.
Some might say that Jesus coincidentally encountered this
woman and healed her, and that Sabbath had nothing to do with it. That is naïve. The observation that the synagogue leader
makes abut six days to work and the Sabbath to rest is spot-on. If Jesus hadn’t come across this unfortunate
woman, he would have found some other deed of mercy to perform. He is obviously intentional in this
work. Luke prepares us for that in his
opening words. He begins, “On the Sabath…” There is not reason to include that if it is
not important to the narrative.
And look at what Jesus does.
He addresses a woman, a stranger, in public, which in itself is counter
to Jewish direction. He touches her,
which is again a taboo. Then, he speaks
his word of power and heals her. This is
not a tale about calendar. It is a
declaration that love trumps law.
Yes, this healing act is intentional. Yes, it is premeditated. Yes, Jesus goes into this act with his eyes
wide open, appreciating its consequences.
I see Bible-thumping conservatives cherry-picking from a
handful of out-of-context verses and using those isolated lines to say, “Look
at them (not us); they, THEY are sinners and enemies of God and people who have
no place among us!” At this point you
can pick your cause, because haters use these passages like Legos, popping one
cause out of the base and snapping another in place.
Jesus says, “No.”
This woman may not be a leader of the synagogue, but she is a daughter
of Abraham. That gives her a place in
the realm of the redeemed, the community of those made whole by the grace of
Jesus Christ. Jesus held no truck with
people who drew lines and erected fences.
He says to the children of Abraham – literal and spiritual – “I have a
place for you.”
People counter, “Yeah, but… how about people who…?” and
Jesus says, “Everybody.” “But how about
folks that…?” “Everybody.” When he
said this, all his opponents were humiliated.
Now, there are folks in today’s world who have built up a
thick enough skin so that they are pretty difficult to humiliate. They make an idol of their hate and
intolerance. Jesus caused this woman to
stand up straight. The first thing she
did, the FIRST thing she did, was praise God.
I don’t know how anyone can make their hatred more important than that.
The peace of the Lord be with you.
10 On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues, 11 and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. 12 When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, “Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.” 13 Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God. 14 Indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, the synagogue leader said to the people, “There are six days for work. So come and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath.” 15 The Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Doesn’t each of you on the Sabbath untie your ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it water? 16 Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?” 17 When he said this, all his opponents were humiliated, but the people were delighted with all the wonderful things he was doing.
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Monday morning coffee
Picture this scenario: a group of pastors is having coffee together on a Monday morning. A Baptist minister says, “I woke up Sunday morning and found a note from my wife on the kitchen table. She has left me and is putting divorce proceedings in motion. I told my church officials about it and they replied, ‘Divorce, huh? That’s rough. We’ll need you out of the parsonage by the end of the week.’ ” What am I going to do? No Baptist church in the world will take on a divorced minister.
The peace of the Lord be with you.
Monday, August 11, 2025
Another Communion Table
I understand that some might say that I am obsessing. That is an observation that it is becoming harder and harder to dispute. For those who haven't previously heard my rant(s), I have a huge issue with the above graphic. It is the Communion Table located within a United Methodist church building in which I recently worshipped. I once again recall the words of James F. White, a giant in the realm of United Methodist worship and in the worship reform movement in general:
Show me a church that has an open Bible
on the Communion Table
and I'll show you a church that doesn't use either one.
This is beyond mere "style" or "preference." The image above is no less than than an idolizing of a Bible. I hesitate to us the word idolatry outright, but I would be greatly interested in a dialog with someone who claims that the label does not apply. In recent posts dated July 14 and 16 I made my case. But, I go to another church and see the same practice again. I have to ask, "From what does this practice arise?"
Researching this practice is difficult, and one is hard-pressed to find any positive recommendations for this display. There are some authorities that report that having a Bible on the Table is a Reformed practice, but a history of the custom is sketchy. Within those communions there is currently more than a little discussion concerning the idol-worship aspect of the practice, particularly as it relates to the impression it makes on non-Christians and those who are new to those churches.
My own belief is that it is a confusing method of appointing a sanctuary at best. With an open mind, I ask, "What does a church say by doing this?" Does the Table of the Lord become a display stand? How is this particular Bible, removed from both lectern and pulpit, employed in worship? What does this mean practically to worshipers who gather in the presence of this arrangement?
One of the worst of arguments falls under the heading of "Decoration." Proponents would say, "Well, it just looks nice. It's pretty. It shows a respect for the Bible." First, we DO NOT decorate our worship space. Those things that appear throughout the room are appointments. We "appoint" our sanctuaries. That is not to say that these appointments might not also be attractive. But they are not there because of their aesthetic value. They serve -- individually and collectively -- to point the worshiper to God. How does an open Bible propped up on a space that should be reserved for the Body and Blood of Christ fulfill that function?
And, I circle back to, "Where does this come from in the first place?" I am afraid that in some churches it was a matter of someone desiring to place a memorial -- a memorial of their choosing -- in the sanctuary. An open Bible out where everyone can see is a weekly reminder of the honoree and the giver. Because the donor is influential or wealthy a Board of Trustees or pastor or worship committee or altar guild gives in to this travesty in the name of not making waves. I'm sorry, but I see the spinelessness or ignorance of clergy as being a major factor. (I have a separate rant reserved for that topic -- watch this space.)
In terms of the visual, the particular Bible can sit front-and-center and be a distraction. But, what better optic than to have that same Bible on the lectern or pulpit and have the preacher/liturgist/lay reader physically open the book, turn to the desired place, and begin to read, concluding with, "This is the Word of the Lord!" ?
That's powerful. That takes that copy of scripture out of the realm of the static and places it dynamically in the center of the worship assembly.
We have no way of establishing uniformity in the worship of The United Methodist Church. There is no governing document or standard set of "best practices." And even when our Book of Worship (or Book of Discipline!) makes a suggestion, churches and clergy feel free to ignore what they don't like, or don't understand, or what they think might ruffle some feathers. The sign outside our buildings says "United Methodist Church," implying that our historical connection means something. And it does somewhat when we are looking to find a new preacher or grudgingly pay our Connectional Giving. But we have become stunningly congregational, with churches and clergy saying -- overtly or by implication -- "I'll do what I want to. No one is going to tell me what to do."
And we end up with pictures like this.
The peace of the Lord be with you.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



